City2City
COVID-19 in African Cities: Impacts, Responses and Policies
27 June 2024 - The report proposes several interventions to promptly and effectively address the challenges of COVID-19 pandemic in Africa at the urban level led by national and local governments supported by international and regional development institutions.

27 June 2024 - COVID-19, a global pandemic declared by the World Health Organization (WHO), is crippling the global economy and upending people’s lives thereby threatening sustainable development across all its dimensions. Africa is also facing the dire consequences of the crisis, necessitating timely response, recovery and rebuilding policies and strategies. Globally, urban areas are the epicenters of the epidemic accounting for most of the confirmed COVID-19 cases.

UN-Habitat in collaboration with UN Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA), UN Capital Development Fund (UNCDF), United Cities and Local Governments of Africa (UCLG), African Development Bank (AfDB), and Shelter Afrique have joined hands to produce this new report: COVID-19 in African Cities: Impacts, Responses and Policies.

The report proposes several interventions to promptly and effectively address the challenges of COVID-19 pandemic in Africa at the urban level led by national and local governments supported by international and regional development institutions.

Download the Full Report Here: https://unhabitat.org/covid-19-in-africa-cities-impacts-responses-and-policies

India's Kerala State Is Combating COVID-19 Through Participatory Governance
26 June 2024 - The left-ruled Indian State of Kerala remains in the global spot for its effective and efficient measures in tackling the COVID-19 pandemic. 
26 June 2024 - The left-ruled Indian State of Kerala remains in the global spot for its effective and efficient measures in tackling the COVID-19 pandemic. The state captured the Indian news headlines, projecting its potential, strength, and humane approach to the outer world, leaving an operative model that other states can follow.

The government’s apt and adaptive state-interventionist strategy even garnered widespread attention across the world, with international media and academic journals, including that of MIT and Oxford, praising the robustness of the ‘Kerala Model’ of development.

In Kerala, over its formative years, the state government along with its collective organisations and trade unions played an instrumental role in building up a robust public sector, which has given the state the leverage to control pandemics and natural disasters. With its almost 100 per cent literacy rate and its top slot in HDI ranking, the state was always receptive and reactive to progressive change.

But this is one (rather important) part of the larger story. Kerala not only has an efficient government but also has at its disposal a conscious and responsive society of people who are well aware that their role in this deathly fight is as important as that of the government. It is with this collective strength that the southern state of India survived the Nipah Virus and two great floods over the past two years.

In sharp contrast to the state of affairs in the rest of India, Kerala’s lead in the COVID fight has to do with its unique participatory governance, where people worked for the government, complementing the efforts of each other. From providing food items to having media briefs every day, the government made sure that the people were out of starvation and were well informed about the situation. On the other hand, various groups of people came forward to volunteer and made sure that the government policies are implemented on time with effect to ‘break the chain’.

Formation of the Sannadha Sena

The Chief Minister of Kerala, Pinarayi Vijayan, called out the youth in the state to join the Sannadha Sena, a community volunteer force formed by the government, comprehending that the government schemes for controlling the crisis needed workforce, other than the state machinery, to be implemented. The online registrations started in March with numerous registrations pouring in to aid the needy.

Though the initial plan was to mobilise around 2.3 lakh able-bodied youth in the age group of 22 to 40, the registrations received a massive response in a month: more than 3 lakh volunteers comprising men, women and transgender people, from different sectors ranging from IT and medical to skilled labourers.

Various organisations, including NGOs, NSS, NCC and Youth Commission called out their volunteers to get involved in the force. Both Kerala’s ruling, as well as opposition parties, also came forward in solidarity to the Sannadha Sena, imploring its members to register themselves with force.

The purpose of the Sannadha Sena was to use its volunteers to provide food, other essentials and physical assistance to those who were under lockdown. After registration, the health authorities examined them and trained them or helping the affected during an outbreak, without compromising their health. The state also gave them the necessary protective equipment and paid for their food and travel expenses.

The Sena comprised of 200 volunteers of each Panchayat, 500 of each municipality and 700 of each corporation. These volunteers enquired in their neighbourhoods whether some residents needed help. They were also vigilant enough to look out for the aged, persons with disabilities, and those who didn't have a home to stay in. The force made sure that these people were taken care of and not ignored. It was through the Sannadha Sena that the government was also effectively able to create a helpline service for assisting the people.

Community Kitchen volunteers

Understanding that the lockdown will adversely impact the abilities of people to earn income, the government made a clarion call to establish community kitchens across the state to provide food at a low and affordable cost. Thus, at the decree of Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, hundreds of such kitchens mushroomed across 941 Panchayats in the state on March 25.

This led to the formation of an ‘Arogya Sena’, where people volunteered to cook meals in large numbers in community kitchens to make sure that nobody went hungry without getting food. By effectively making use of the ground level resources of the local self-governments and community groups, arrangements were also made to distribute food at free of cost to those who were not able to afford them. In an extraordinary move, measures were also taken to directly deliver these free meals at the footsteps of people who couldn't afford it, thus protecting and valuing their dignity in front of others.

The operations of the community kitchens were conducted in such a manner that two batches of people, one for cooking and the other for distributing cooked meals, were given passes to work in the community kitchens in two timelines, one in the morning to cook the food and other at noon to distribute them, preserving the protocols of social distancing. Food packets amounting to 2.8 lakhs are being distributed a day in Kerala by these volunteers.

Other than the government, several organisations, local clubs and private individuals also sponsored funds to help in running these community kitchens.

Reaching out to families with Kudumbasree

The role of Kudumbasree, a three-tier community network project of women self-help groups, was put to use at multiple levels. Not only were they involved in the setting up of numerous community kitchens in the nooks and corners of the state, but the government was also able to call upon them for various other purposes as well, to reach out to families.

Kudumbashree formed 1.9 lakh WhatsApp groups with 22 lakh neighbourhood group members to educate them about Government instructions regarding COVID-19. They gave a note to all the 43 lakh neighbourhood group members which they discussed at their meetings. The note was regarding details of ‘Break the Chain’ campaign and the need for special care for those above 60 years of age.

Kudumbashree was also involved in preparing and selling lakhs of cotton masks through their 306 tailoring units. Numerous microenterprise units had prepared sanitisers when there was a shortage for it. Also, their tailoring units have prepared cloth bags for supplying it to the Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation.

Since the continuous lockdown periods forced people to not go to work, it was hard for families, especially those who were working in the informal sector, to sustain themselves without any source of income. Thus, the government needed to infuse people with the necessary money during the pandemic period. It was through Kudumbasree that the government was able to give away interest-free loans worth ₹2000 crore to the families who needed them.

In places that were noted as ‘red spots’ in Kerala, strict directions were given to the people to abstain themselves from getting out of their houses, except for medical and other emergencies. To enable people to get groceries and other essentials without having them to go out, the local self-governments contacted the local Kudumbasree members and granted them the permission to collect and deliver those essential purchases directly to individual homes, limiting further contamination in those spots.

Active Political and Cultural Organisations

The various political and cultural organisations in Kerala played a crucial role in reaching out to the ordinary people, taking care of each of their struggling families and distributing them with kits of vegetables and essential dry food grains.

Members of both the ruling CPI(M) and the opposition INC decentralised efforts locally and took care of people by regularly ensuring that they were comfortable during the lockdown. 

Over the years, consecutive Kerala governments have adopted unique and joint governance models that combine the efforts of both the government and communities in a people-centric development approach. The state has invested heavily in the public sector, thus decreasing the class disparities in accessing health, as well as other services. An atmosphere of policies guided by the theory of the welfare state and participatory management systems made Kerala’s development indices stand out from the rest of the country.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE LINK: https://www.indepthnews.net/index.php/the-world/asia-pacific/3563-india-s-kerala-is-combating-covid-19-through-participatory-governance

Image by Nicolas DEBRAY from Pixabay 

Online Course - Development and Planning in African Cities
22 June 2024 - As African cities grow, learn how development and planning help urban actors to make cities just and sustainable for all.
22 June 2024 - In the next 35 years, Africa will need to accommodate almost 900 million new urban dwellers. Hundreds of smaller cities are doubling in size every 20 years, half of Africa’s urban dwellers live in informal settlements in precarious conditions, and 75% of these are younger than 35.

Development and Planning in African Cities: Exploring theories, policies and practices from Sierra Leone will explore African cities through the lenses of spatial justice and social diversity, challenging myths and assumptions about urban development and demonstrating how different processes interact and shape the development of a city.

What topics will you cover?

Week 1: Introduction to development and planning in African cities

  • What is development? What is planning?
  • Normative crosscutting lenses: spatial justice and social diversity
  • Urban change and the evolution of planning

Week 2: Urban land & informalities

  • Diversity of meanings, values, and functions of urban land
  • Formal and informal urban land markets and tenure systems
  • What are urban informalities? Economic and spatial dimensions of informality

Week 3: Governance & planning

  • Devolution of powers and fiscal autonomy
  • Scales: city-level, metropolitan, regional
  • Participatory planning (planning from below)

Week 4: Urban risk, vulnerabilities & infrastructure

  • Understanding urban risk and coping/adaptation strategies
  • Urban health
  • Co-production of urban infrastructures.

Course Instructors:

  • Andrea Rigon is working on inequalities, diversity and cities in global South. Based at Bartlett Development Planning Unit, University College London. Founder of Sierra Leone Urban Research Centre. T: @rigonandre
  • Joseph M Macarthy is an urban research expert and a well-established scholar in urban planning and management. He is the Executive director of SLURC and lectures at Njala University.

Who is the course for?

  • The course is open to people from any disciplinary background with a desire to learn about urban development and planning in African cities and potentially to those who would like to pursue a career in urban development or planning.
  • It is suitable for urban professionals who work or may in the future want to work in Sub-Saharan Africa and would like to gain an understanding of how its cities are made and developed.

Start Date: The course is available now and will take four week to complete. The start date is flexible and can be selected on the course website.

To Register and Find More Information on the Course: https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/african-cities

Local Action, Global Impact - Celebrating Three Decades of Local Action for People and Planet

This commemorative publication celebrates 30 years of the GEF Small Grants Programme's local action and global impact. The publication highlights the important role of local communities, civil society and Indigenous Peoples, youth, women and persons with disabilities in addressing global environmental issues – such as biodiversity loss, climate change mitigation and adaptation, land degradation, international waters, and chemicals and waste management – while improving well-being and livelihoods. Throughout its journey, SGP has continuously evolved and has now grown into a unique global delivery mechanism to scale up local actions that can develop and deliver solutions to these multiple challenges.

Local Action, Global Impact - Celebrating Three Decades of Local Action for People and Planet

Originally published by UNDP on 22 August 2024

This commemorative publication celebrates 30 years of the GEF Small Grants Programme (SGP)'s local action and global impact. The publication highlights the important role of local communities, civil society and Indigenous Peoples, youth, women and persons with disabilities in addressing global environmental issues – such as biodiversity loss, climate change mitigation and adaptation, land degradation, international waters, and chemicals and waste management – while improving well-being and livelihoods. Throughout its journey, SGP has continuously evolved and has now grown into a unique global delivery mechanism to scale up local actions that can develop and deliver solutions to these multiple challenges.

Access the full report here or download the attached PDF of the report

Rescuing SDG 11 for a resilient urban planet

Rescuing SDG 11 for a resilient urban planet

SDG 11 Synthesis Report for the High-Level Political Forum (HLPF) 2024 by UN-Habitat</</div>

a> 

The current report shows that the world is off track in achieving SDG 11. Rescuing SDG 11 is urgent for the sake of present and future generations. The report points to the immense opportunities that exist and the innovations that are already underway.

The report was prepared by UN-Habitat as a lead coordinator, with inputs from several UN custodian agencies, other UN entities, civil society, academia, United Cities and Local Governments, and various other stakeholders and partners.

Full Report | Executive Summary | Key Highlights | Facts and Figures

The Global Sustainable Development Report 2024
The GSDR 2024 highlights key transformations needed in different sectors and provides key findings from the literature, practical examples and tools for progress towards the SDGs. It provides a stylized model to help unpack and understand the transformation process over time and outline the roles of different levers in facilitating various stages of transformation through a systematic and structured approach. As history has shown, transformations are inevitable, and this report emphasizes that deliberate and desirable transformations are possible - and, indeed, necessary.

The Global Sustainable Development Report 2024

"Times of Crisis, Times of Change: Science for Accelerating Transformations to Sustainable Development", the 2024 Global Sustainable Development Report (GSDR), finds that at this critical juncture, midway to 2030, incremental and fragmented change is insufficient to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the remaining seven years. Implementation of the 2030 Agenda requires the active mobilization of political leadership and ambition for science-based transformations. This must be achieved globally - leaving no country, society or person behind. The report is an invitation to embrace transformations with the urgency needed to accelerate progress towards the SDGs.

Background

The Global Sustainable Development Report (GSDR) originated in “The Future We Want,” the outcome of the Rio+20 conference on sustainable development, when Member States were laying the groundwork for the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the 17 associated Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The negotiators knew that the 2030 Agenda would be complex, and unprecedented in ambition, and that a siloed approach to development would not be adequate. They recognized the power of science to understand and navigate relationships among social, environmental and economic development objectives, and so they called for a report to strengthen the science-policy interface.

In 2016, Member States decided that the report should be produced once every four years, to inform the quadrennial SDG review deliberations (SDG Summit) at the General Assembly, and that it should be written by an Independent Group of Scientists appointed by the Secretary-General. They mandated that the Group would consist of 15 experts representing a variety of backgrounds, scientific disciplines and institutions, ensuring geographical and gender balance.

The 2019 Global Sustainable Development Report, The Future is Now: Science for Achieving Sustainable Development, was the first report prepared by an Independent Group of Scientists appointed by the United Nations Secretary-General. The 2024 Global Sustainable Development Report, "Times of Crisis, Times of Change: Science for Accelerating Transformations to Sustainable Development", is the second.

Access the full report here or from the attached PDF

Harnessing the Role of Private Sector in Waste Management through South-South and Triangular Cooperation for Inclusive Urbanization
The case study aims to take a snapshot of the municipal waste management ecosystems of certain countries in the Global South, particularly focusing on private sector-led good practices, inclusive growth and sustainable financing. The countries were selected upon criteria such as GDP, total waste production and geographic variety. The study specifically refers to Municipal Solid Waste which includes food waste, paper, plastic, rags, metal and glass, although demolition and construction debris are often included in collected waste, as are small quantities of hazardous waste, such as electric light bulbs, batteries, automotive parts and discarded medicines and chemicals. 

Harnessing the Role of Private Sector in Waste Management through South-South and Triangular Cooperation for Inclusive Urbanization

Originally published by UNDP on 12 September 2024

By identifying and shedding light on the good practices within the context, promoting cooperation amongst the countries in the South-South and promoting private sector engagement in the waste management sector it is possible to replicate and scale up these practices and ultimately achieve an inclusive urbanization scenario in the future.

Download the full report here or from the attached PDF

Governments must seek win-win synergies by tackling climate and sustainable development crises together, urges expert group report
A groundbreaking report by a group of independent experts released today by the United Nations outlines steps governments should take to maximize the impact of policies and actions by tackling the climate and sustainable development crises at the same time, creating synergies.

Governments must seek win-win synergies by tackling climate and sustainable development crises together, urges expert group report 

Press Release by UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA) | Original article published on 13 September 2024

New York, 13 September 2024 --

The expert group, with fourteen diverse members co-led by Luis Gomez-Echeverri, Emeritus Research Scholar at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, and Heide Hackmann, Director of Future Africa, University of Pretoria, was co-convened earlier this year by the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA) and the UN Climate Change secretariat (UNFCCC) to produce this report, the first of its kind.

"Maximizing synergies between climate action and the SDGs has never been more critical," said Li Junhua, UN Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs. "We must get the SDGs on track and keep the goal of 1.5 degrees alive,” he said, also stressing that an integrated approach that seeks to strengthen synergies between these two global agendas is critical to that end."

"Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals and stabilizing our climate to build resilient societies are two sides of the same endeavour," said Simon Stiell, UNFCCC Executive Secretary. "I am confident that the work of the Expert Group will spur additional efforts that can result in win-win outcomes for both climate action and the SDG agenda and transition us towards a just, equitable, and sustainable world."

The report preface also cites UN Secretary-General António Guterres' rallying cry that “climate action is the 21st century's greatest opportunity to drive forward all the Sustainable Development Goals."

Building the evidence base

Evidence indicates strong synergies between addressing climate change and achieving the SDGs, the report states, whereby advancements in one can lead to improvements in the other. Therefore, pursuing the 2030 Agenda and implementation of the Paris Agreement in concert can significantly advance both agendas. Co-benefits of climate actions often directly achieve the SDG goals, and evidence suggests that co-benefits outweigh trade-offs in most cases.

Among the examples cited, achieving universal electricity access in sub-Saharan Africa by 2030 (SDG 7) would require an annual investment of USD 27 billion under existing climate policies, but would require an additional USD 6 billion without climate policies. Stringent air pollution control and GHG mitigation measures would help bring 40% of the global population exposed to unhealthy particulate matter levels below the WHO air quality guideline, with the largest improvements realized for India, China and the Middle East.

According to the report, the factors blocking more synergistic actions revolve around knowledge gaps, political and institutional arrangements, and economic disruptions. In particular, the main barriers include lack of funding to analyse and finance more integrated policy actions; institutional rigidity that puts climate and development policy in separate silos; the dominance of top-down policy making; a general lack of data and indicators, and a lack of understanding about the value of synergies and the capacity to identify and implement them.

Report recommendations

The report calls for greater institutional coordination and policy coherence across sectors and departments at the national level, to better integrate SDG and climate policy development and action. It also recommends that the governance and policy frameworks for both the Paris Agreement and the 2030 Agenda will need to be changed in order to align climate action with the SDGs.

The expert group suggests that country commitment and reporting mechanisms, such as the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) under the Paris Agreement and the Voluntary National Reviews (VNRs) undertaken under Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development, should include synergistic targets or co-benefits. Currently, only 23 of the 173 NDCs explicitly refer to SDGs, even though they have a major impact on achieving the SDGs at regional and global levels, and none go into detail about how climate policy affects SDG outcomes.

Among positive examples referenced, in Kenya, the Climate Change Department conducted an SDG impact analysis of the proposed measures of the National Climate Change Action Plan for 2018-2022. This analysis helped capture SDG-climate synergies and identify opportunities for low-carbon development in the country. Mexico evaluated how existing NDCs would affect implementation of the 2030 Agenda nationally. All 169 SDG targets were examined and 64 were found to have potential co-benefits to climate mitigation and adaptation.  

The report also recommends that policymakers have stronger links with researchers studying climate and development, who could assess possible synergies. Addressing the significant disconnect between scientific evidence and applied policy action can ensure the best scientifically verified policies are agreed and carried out.                          

Differences across countries

North and South. Synergies are highly dependent on national priorities and context, the report finds. In the Global South, GHG emission reduction goals are primarily focused on regulating land use, which also advances several SDGs. in the Global North, synergies often emerge from the region’s pathway to a clean energy transition. The interlinkages between SDG and climate action are more pronounced for low-income and lower-middle-income countries, the report states, as SDG progress and financing gaps are far more pressing for many of these countries than reducing the impacts of climate change.

Cities. The report also notes that, with some 56% of the global population living in cities, expected to rise to 70% by 2050, the drive for sustainable cities (SDG 11) presents a major challenge and opportunity to advance climate action at the city level, especially in the Global South. There are many examples of cities around the world where these synergies have brought significant benefits in sustainable transport, sustainable use of urban space, lower greenhouse gases, less air pollution and improved health.

Finance. The large investment gap in climate and development action, and insufficient finance to enhance the synergies needed, are rooted in the deep failure of the global financial architecture and finance fragmentation that makes policy coherence difficult, the report finds. Current efforts to address these failures at the international level should include measures that encourage multilateral development banks and international financial institutions to introduce instruments that enhance climate and development synergies.

Next steps

The report issued today is a first edition that will be expanded with deeper analysis, more data and more developed recommendations in time for the major UN summits in 2024, particularly the Summit of the Future. The dialogue and engagement that has been building, including through the Fourth Global Conference on Climate and SDG Synergies in July 2024, will continue to be expanded through the upcoming UNFCCC Regional Climate Weeks and other avenues, and a fifth global conference is being planned in 2024.

Read the full report here.

Is The Way Many Cities Have Been Designed Making Them Even Hotter?

The Arup study found Madrid’s urban centre has the most extreme urban heat island “hot spot” of six major cities it looked at around the world, with temperatures 15.5 degrees Fahrenheit hotter than in nearby rural surroundings.

Is The Way Many Cities Have Been Designed Making Them Even Hotter?

Originally published by Forbes on 17 August 2024

Photo of Madrid, Spain from Unsplash

While cities are traditionally seen higher temperatures than rural areas, this summer’s record-breaking heatwaves have made the differences even starker, bring the concept of the urban heat island to the fore.

The concept refers to the notion that heat often becomes trapped, particularly at street level in congested and enclosed spaces.

This means people who live in cities often face higher temperatures, often both during the day and the night.

The question now is how can we alleviate the issue of urban heat, especially given the obvious health and climate implications.

According to the authors of a new study published by Arup, city design is playing a major role in driving up urban temperatures.

Using AI and satellite images from space, Arup mapped the most extreme hot spots in a sample of the urban centres in major cities around the world.

Arup used its digital analytics tool to understand the difference in air temperatures experienced from neighbourhood to neighbourhood, on the hottest day in each city in 2022.

The authors are calling on city leaders, urban designers and planners to better understand how their designs can mitigate hot spots, particularly for the most vulnerable communities.

Arup’s nature positive design lead, Dima Zogheib said many major cities have “inadvertently” been designed to be hot.

“We've really pushed nature out in the past and concreted our streets and open spaces, and what we’re finding out more and more that nature has a big role to play in cooling our cities,” Zogheib told me.

She said nature-based solutions like increasing tree canopy coverage can help lower temperatures, as well as using more permeable surfaces for pavements and walkways.

Zogheib using greenery, solar panels or reflective materials on rooftops can also help reduce ambient temperatures, and planners need to make sure there are plenty of accessible open spaces.

She added it was important to consider the creation of “cool spaces” where people can get shelter and respite during any heatwaves.

And she said more thought must be given to how daily routines and working patterns may also have to change.

“If we look cities around the Mediterranean, they have adjusted their lives for centuries around the summer heat,” she told me.

“We need to reconsider working hours during heatwaves, like moving towards a more evening-based economy.”

The survey also showed Mumbai had the second most severe hot spot with an additional 12.5 degrees, while New York and London both saw hot spots of 8 degrees.

The study found in the majority of cities studied, the hottest spots had less than 6% vegetation cover, while the coolest spots in most cities had over 70% and were found almost entirely in parks, away from residential and commercial areas.

This contributed to massive temperature swings within individual cities.

Last month, the non-profit Climate Central published data which claimed the urban heat island effect means 41 million Americans are being exposed to significantly higher temperatures.

The study found nine cities are home to at least one million people in urban heat islands where temperatures are elevated by at least eight degrees Fahrenheit, including New York, Houston and Los Angeles.

In some neighborhoods, the urban heat island effect was found to boost temperatures by 10 degrees Fahrenheit or more, impacting more than 10-percent of residents in Chicago, New York City and Washington D.C.

Climate Central’s senior data analyst, Jen Brady said in an interview there is a growing sense that infrastructure and the way some cities are built may have to change in order to combat climate change and rising temperatures.

“In the more Northern part of the United States, the major goal was always to stay warm,” Brady told me.

“If a city trapped heat, that was seen as a positive thing,” she added.

“In warmer parts of the United States, the approach was fundamentally different, because they were not trying to stay warm. They used different building materials and lighter colours.”

She added there are plenty of solutions already out there to help bring urban temperatures down, from green roofs to different colour road surfaces.

“Hopefully, as we go forward with making changes in our cities, we will keep extreme heat in mind.”

And Jeff Terry, vice president sustainability at GAF said in an email that historically, U.S. cities were not designed with addressing urban heat as a priority.

Terry added that there’s no single solution that will address extreme heat, so he said it is important that metropolitan areas look at the impact of layering different solutions together across a community.

“Solutions like solar reflective pavement coatings, cool roof products, as well as increased tree cover and shading at a community-wide scale, offer a myriad of benefits and provide easier maintenance, but they are also the key to a more sustainable and more resilient future,” said Terry.

Retrieved from forbes.com/sites/jamiehailstone/2024/08/17/is-the-way-many-cities-have-been--designed-making-them-even-hotter/?sh=343560f87303

Rescuing SDG 11 for a resilient urban planet
The event will focus on key transformative policy and investment shifts necessary to accelerate progress with SDG 11 and recovery from the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the full implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development at all levels.

Rescuing SDG 11 for a resilient urban planet

Official Side-Event by UN-Habitat at the 2024 High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development

14 July 2024 from 8:30 - 9:30 AM Eastern Standard Time at UN Headquarters, Conference Room 11, New York

Online Link on UN Web TV

Objectives

Specifically, it will consider priorities for:

  • Anchoring sustainable cities and human settlements at the center of national planning, development policies and investments plans to deliver better outcomes for everyone everywhere
  • Shifting economic and financing models for more effective investments in how cities are planned, managed and governed
  • Fostering multi-level, multi-sector and multistakeholder governance to realize SDG 11 and the 2030 Agenda more broadly
  • Tackling inequality within and between cities to narrow the great urban divide
  • Anticipating and preparing for the future of humanity and global resilience in an urban planet

Abstract

By 2030, we will not meet most SDG 11 targets without major shifts in urban policy and investments in local government. The consequences of not achieving SDG 11 in particular are immense, directly impacting billions of people’s daily lives. It is urgent to prevent the disastrous effects consequences ahead of us by changing the way we plan, manage, and govern our cities and human settlements. To avoid a collective failure and to rescue SDG 11 but also Agenda 2030 more broadly, actions need to be taken now and at scale across cities and human settlements. In line with the call of the UN General Assembly to rescue the SDGs,1 this is the moment to rescue SDG 11 through scaled action and investments. This side event will focus on the urgent transformative shifts needed to embrace innovative and bold measures to accelerate SDG 11 progress. It considers new ways of thinking and working that can positively alter the way in which policies are designed, implemented, and financed to accelerate progress with SDG 11 and recovery from the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the full implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development at all levels.

Background

Humanity’s present and future is urban. Now is the time for leaders to think, plan and act urban. Agenda 2030 sets out a vision of common global goals that links humanity’s future to the fate of cities and human settlements. For millennia, the economic and political transformation of societies has gone hand in hand with the evolution of villages into towns and cities. Urban growth continues in all world regions, and in a rapid, unplanned manner in some parts. Urbanization—how cities develop and grow—determines the quality of life for an estimated 4.4 billion people globally. This premise led the General Assembly to adopt Sustainable Development Goal 11: to make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. Creating the conditions for environmentally sustainable, economically prosperous, and socially equitable and just cities and communities is of paramount importance for present and future generations.

As SDG 11 is cross-cutting and a foundation to realize 63% of all the other SDGs, the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development will be won or lost in cities. Achieving SDG 11 is also a necessary means for accelerating the recovery from the negative socio-economic impact of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19).

At its core, SDG 11 sets benchmarks for urban development policies and practices that facilitate access to adequate housing, basic services, energy, public transportation and open space for everyone everywhere. This goal is achieved when member states and city managers develop policies, embrace integrated planning and develop investment budgets alongside stakeholders in a way that offers opportunities for all. As such, the day-to-day lived experiences of the world’s urban dwellers depend on the realization of SDG 11.

Additionally, global divergence is a prominent feature today in our urban planet. The widening gap between the haves and have nots is manifested in cities through spatial fragmentation, climate-driven inequalities and the digital divide. The lack of progress towards attaining SDG 11 is bound to exacerbate these global divides. The success of efforts to enhance global resilience thus on what happens in cities and human settlements.

By 2030, we will not meet most SDG 11 targets without major shifts in urban policy and investments in local government. The consequences of not achieving SDG 11 in particular are immense, directly impacting billions of people’s daily lives. When urban challenges are left unaddressed, they can escalate into global threats that affect all of humanity.

It is urgent to prevent the disastrous effects consequences ahead of us by changing the way we plan, manage, and govern our cities and human settlements. To avoid a collective failure and to rescue Agenda 2030, actions need to be taken now and at scale across cities and human settlements. The immense opportunities inherent in urbanization must be leveraged for optimal outcomes.

Positive transformative change that Member States and stakeholders have called for at the High-Level Meeting on the Implementation of the New Urban Agenda (2022) and at the 11th session of World Urban Forum (2022) respectively requires political will, policy continuity, and policy agility to developed local level action plans with the required budget and financing strategies to make measurable and swift progress.

Expected Outcomes

  • Elevated multi-level, multi-sector and multistakeholder engagement and collaboration to implement SDG 11
  • Enhanced commitments to enable transformative policy, investment and governance shifts necessary to achieve SDG 11
  • Improved understanding of opportunities and effective practices for scaling and spreading impacts towards SDG 11
  • Enhanced perspectives on global urban futures and their implications for the Pact for Future (2024 summit of the future)

For further information, please contact: Edlam Abera Yemeru ()

Concept Note: unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2024/06/hlpf_2024_side_event_-_concept_note_final.pdf